I was browsing through my emails today, and to my surprise, I got an email about an article entitled Why Andy Roddick Will Never Beat Roger Federer . I found this article very interesting, and it hit the nail on the head. However, I think its a little too late for the debate. Andy has fallen out of the picture of being a top contender, and he has been replaced by players like Novak Djokovic and David Ferrer. The train has left the station, and Andy isn’t on it. But if you look at the top three players, Roger, Rafael, and Novak, they play a thinking man’s game. They have power, but they pick there spots. They have very versatile games. On the other hand, Andy is a unidimensional player. He thinks he can blast the ball past opponents, and he has an extremely difficult time adjusting his game. In my opinion, Andy embodies the delusional American mentality - the more powerful you are, the better - and Roger, Rafael, and Novak prove that point.
No comments yet. Why not post one?